What is num_units in tensorflow BasicLSTMCell?
In MNIST LSTM examples, I don’t understand what “hidden layer” means. Is it the imaginary-layer formed when you represent an unrolled RNN over time?
Why is the
num_units = 128 in most cases ?
The number of hidden units is a direct representation of the learning capacity of a neural network — it reflects the number of learned parameters. The value
128 was likely selected arbitrarily or empirically. You can change that value experimentally and rerun the program to see how it affects the training accuracy (you can get better than 90% test accuracy with a lot fewer hidden units). Using more units makes it more likely to perfectly memorize the complete training set (although it will take longer, and you run the risk of over-fitting).
The key thing to understand, which is somewhat subtle in the famous Colah’s blog post (find “each line carries an entire vector”), is that
X is an array of data (nowadays often called a tensor) — it is not meant to be a scalar value. Where, for example, the
tanh function is shown, it is meant to imply that the function is broadcast across the entire array (an implicit
for loop) — and not simply performed once per time-step.
As such, the hidden units represent tangible storage within the network, which is manifest primarily in the size of the weights array. And because an LSTM actually does have a bit of it’s own internal storage separate from the learned model parameters, it has to know how many units there are — which ultimately needs to agree with the size of the weights. In the simplest case, an RNN has no internal storage — so it doesn’t even need to know in advance how many “hidden units” it is being applied to.
- A good answer to a similar question here.
- You can look at the source for BasicLSTMCell in TensorFlow to see exactly how this is used.
Side note: This notation is very common in statistics and machine-learning, and other fields that process large batches of data with a common formula (3D graphics is another example). It takes a bit of getting used to for people who expect to see their
for loops written out explicitly.
Answered By – Brent Bradburn